Monday, July 22, 2013

Australia puts bounty on people-smugglers

Australia said Sunday it would pay rewards of up to Aus$200,000 (US$180,000) for information leading to the conviction of people-smugglers, as it defended its tougher approach on asylum-seekers.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd on Friday announced that refugees arriving on unauthorised boats would have no chance of being resettled in Australia in a bid to stop the rush of asylum-seekers arriving by sea. Instead they will be sent to poverty-stricken Papua New Guinea for processing.

Home Affairs Minister Jason Clare said Sunday that Australian Federal Police would also pay rewards for the capture of the people-smugglers behind the boats and their associates.

“These people are peddling in misery and death. We need to shut this market down. That’s why we are putting a bounty on their heads,” Clare said.

“We have taken the product they are selling off the shelves, we also need to lock these people up.

“If you provide police with the information we need to lock people smugglers up you will receive up to $200,000.”

More than 15,600 asylum-seekers have arrived in Australia by boat in 2013, despite scores of drownings en route in recent years, and the issue is set to be key in upcoming national elections.

Foreign Minister Bob Carr said that boat arrivals could top 50,000 this year as he defended the government’s toughened approach of sending would-be refugees to Papua New Guinea.

“The spike in the numbers of people being brought by people smugglers makes it unavoidable,” he told Sky News.

“You have got 3,000 people arriving a month. The annual rate is something like 40 to 50,000 a year if it continues at this level.

“If it continues at this level — the prime minister was very persuaded by this — it could rise further as people smugglers really close in to make a financial killing.”

Carr said the new approach carried the message that asylum-seekers, who paid people-smugglers thousands of dollars to bring them to Australia, were risking their lives at sea but would still not be resettled in Australia.

“The simple bold message is we decided where you are processed, we decided where you are settled and if you arrive by boat without a visa it is not going to be on Australian soil,” Carr said.

Australian Federal Police said they were battling more than one syndicate involved in people-smuggling as they called for the public’s help in shutting down the networks.

Clare said criminals in Australia were part of international people-smuggling syndicates which stretched from Australia to Indonesia and to places such as Malaysia, Pakistan, Iran and Iraq.

He said these people helped to organise passengers, collect payments from asylum-seekers and transfer money overseas.

The penalty for people smuggling offences in Australia is up to 20 years in jail.

AFP

Alvivi : Stop the public LYNCHING

Alvivi : Stop the public LYNCHINGThe decision of the AG to charge Alvin Tan and Vivian Lee marks the half-way point in the public lynching of these two young people.

What were they guilty of?

A moment of unthinking madness; an act of stupidity and idiocy; a prank in bad taste; racial and religious insensitivity; youthful arrogance – yes, these criticisms and much more in the way of scorn and public shame and odium can be heaped on their foolish and misguided attempt to draw attention to themselves.

But to charge them for sedition and for a criminal act under the penal code! And then to deny them bail as if they are a major threat to public peace and order. Please!

Let us not forget that prominent politicians guilty of even more in your face racial and religious taunting have got away scot free, with the last notable racist political figure even put up as a candidate during the recent election. And what about even earlier incidents such as kris brandishing?

Come on, Malaysia!

Alvin and Vivian have already apologized for their offensive Selamat Berbuka Puasa ‘greeting’, calling it their “stupidest stunt” and reiterating that it was done in humour.

In a youtube posting available to everyone who should view it first before calling for their heads to be off, Alvin said,

“We are recording this video to ask for forgiveness for offending Muslims in this holy month of Ramadan. We sincerely regret offending religious beliefs and sensitivities in multi-cultural Malaysia,”

He also said that they had no intent to insult or ridicule the Muslim faith, nor incite racial conflict.

In most societies except the most blinkered, the authorities and public would have moved on to more important matters.

But not in Malaysia where foaming politicians and retired politicians have bayed for the young couple’s blood and are urging our ‘independent and impartial’ judiciary to impose the most serious punishment possible.

Alvin had ended the video by saying “selamat Aidilfitri dan maaf zahir batin (happy Aidilfitri and apologies for all discretions)”. He may not be genuinely repentant. But shouldn’t we give him the benefit of the doubt.

Apparently to the lynching and vigilante mob, this plea for forgiveness and compassion is not enough.

Viewing (mainly with pity and sadness) what is happening to this young couple and the innocent youth who had the words "Saya hina agama Islam" scrawled on his chest, leads me to wonder what has happened to us in this country that we can allow a few political and religious leaders, the media and our authorities to make a national controversy over a mindless stunt by two young people, blow it out of all rational proportion and act as if they are speaking on behalf of moderate Malaysians.

Alvin and Vivian invited this on themselves when they stupidly posted their crude prank. By surrendering to the lynch mob, we dishonor our core values of humanity, compassion and mercy.

Full article: http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/

Former Indonesian VP denies speaking to Berita Harian

Former Indonesian vice-president Jusuf Kalla, said to have mediated a deal between top Malaysian political rivals to respect the outcome of the May 5 general election, has written to an UMNO-owned daily denying he had given any interview to the paper.

In a short letter to Berita Harian yesterday, Jusuf (pic) said the paper's correspondent Al-Azharri Siddiq had never conducted any interview with him, based on which the daily had last month published a report.

The report claimed that Jusuf had accused Pakatan Rakyat of receiving foreign funds to engineer the mass post-election rallies protesting electoral frauds.

"What was reported by Berita Harian as an interview is not correct. Following this, Al-Azharri has already apologised to me many times," Jusuf said in his letter addressed to Berita Harian's chief editor.

Earlier in parliament, Anwar said he had proof to show that that Jusuf had never made any statement criticising Anwar's refusal to accept the general election as fair. -HD

Americk takes Ops Scorpene back in time to the night of the Altantuya murder

Americk takes Ops Scorpene back in time to the night of the Altantuya murderSUARAM's latest Ops Scorpene fundraiser turned out to be a thriller, thanks to a scintillating talk by Americk Sidhu, the lawyer for the late P.I. Bala.

Guests who attended listened with pin-drop silence as Americk spoke of the night the 28-year Mongolian lady Altantuya Shaariibuu was killed by two of Prime Minister Najib Razak's ex-bodyguards - Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azhar.

Basing his talk on a police statement made by one of the bodyguards, Americk took the audience back in time to October 18, 2006.

It was on that fateful night that Altantuya had been tricked into following the duo to a jungle clearing in Shah Alam. She had asked for permission to urinate, and then sensing they were out to kill, she pleaded for mercy, telling them that she was pregnant.

But the duo took no notice. She was "wrestled to the ground" by Azilah and shot in the left side of the head twice by Sirul.

Both men are now appealing the death sentence meted out to them.

Altantuya was "officially" the translator for Razak Baginda, Najib's close associate and a negotiator in the Malaysian government's purchase of 2 Scorpene submarines from French firm DCNS.




The link to Najib

The deal that had been approved by Najib who was then the Defense minister. It was Najib's silence and the government's refusal had prompted SUARAM to file a complaint in the French courts, where a hearing is midway.

"SUARAM took a bold step in 2009 to pursue the corruption case involving the purchase of two SCORPENE submarines by the Malaysian Ministry of Defence from the French supplier, DCNS. The decision to lodge a corruption complaint in the French court was because SUARAM faced brickwall after brickwall from the Malaysian authorities," SUARAM had said in a statement.

"From the complaint lodge and after almost two years of initial investigations, the French authorities found enough evidence to appoint two judges to lead a court inquiry as per the French Judicial System.

"Malaysians were filled with excitement, hope and encouragement that the truth may finally be revealed, even though if it is through an overseas court. As expected, the legal journey is a long and slow process and meanwhile the EURO 3,000 a month retainer fee for our French legal team needs to be paid."

Hot details comng out from Hong Kong

Last night's dinner was warmly attended and although it was not packed - perhaps because of the fasting month - the majority of the tables appeared to have been taken up.

Part of the reason is also that most Malaysians know that while the French hearing is ongoing, SUARAM will not be able to release as many new details as it may want to.

"Although there have been slow but positive developments on the French side, the OpsScorpene Team is unable to reveal too much at any point in time as it may derail the court process," said SUARAM.

"The French courts have received great cooperation from the Hong Kong authorities in revealing the movements of illicit funds. Many names of individuals and companies have surfaced linking to politicians and political parties," it added.

Malaysia Chronicle

'16:16' in Terengganu will ensure ruling BN serve the people

There will be no change of government if PAS wins the Kuala Besut by-election, resulting in an equal split of total state seats i Terengganu, said PAS's by-election campaign chief Husam Musa.

As such, Husam said there was nothing for BN leaders to fear if PAS wins, unless they are not following law and order.

“Terengganu BN government, in our opinion, can still rule (if PAS wins), but they no longer can act at will, and we (PAS) will have a constructive role in bringing out a people-oriented state administration,” Husam told Malay daily Sinar Harian.

The PAS vice president said the party could serve as an effective agent for check and balance in the Terengganu administration.

Meanwhile party information chief Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man said the people in the state would benefit the most if PAS wins.

Describing the '16:16' state assembly as a leap for Terengganu’s people, Tuan Ibrahim said a PAS victory would enable the party to ensure the BN-led Terengganu government's transparency.

“BN supporters should also vote for PAS candidate so (Terengganu Menteri Besar) Ahmad Said cannot victimise BN supporters who voted for BN in state constituencies won by opposition,” said Tuan Ibrahim.

After forming the state government following the May 5 polls, Ahmad said there would be no development funds for constituencies won by Pakatan Rakyat. -HD

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

The indelible ink supplier is SPR friend?

Pandan parliamentarian Rafizi Ramli today claimed that the supplier of indelible ink to the Election Commission (EC) is businessman Mohd Salleh Mohd Ali, who allegedly secured the contract through direct negotiation.

Citing a source from the EC, Rafizi told Dewan Rakyat said Mohd Salleh was awarded the contract to supply EC with indelible ink, caps and T-shirt for the recent 13th general election.

He claimed that Mohd Salleh has a close relationship with BN’s top brass, including the EC chairman and deputy chairman.

“He owns three companies, one of which is Integrated Challenge Malaysia Sdn Bhd. And he also controls two other companies which were shortlisted for the tender, by using his employee’s name Norsiah Yusuf, who is a director in his company,” Rafizi claimed.

Calling Mohd Salleh “a closed-tender expert in getting supplying jobs with the government”, he alleged that Mohd Salleh has been given contracts especially from the Defence Ministry.

“That’s why when Kinabatangan (Bung Mokhtar Radin) said some Umno division heads were not given any contracts, its not surprising as they are not experts in closed tender,” he said, taking potshots at BN.

He asked the government to outline move to reduce such practice.

Kepala Batas MP Reezal Merican responded by asking what was wrong about closed tenders, saying that this has been in practice since Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim was the deputy prime minister.

In reply Rafizi said closed tenders should only be applied to contracts which involved strategic information or technology transfer, and not jobs that “the whole world can do”.

He said awarding the indelible ink contract in the form of closed tender was a waste of public fund, and the quality of the product supplied was proven to be unsatisfactory.

- http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/

Bung accuses DAP of sponsoring Alvivi

Kinabatangan MP Bung Mokhtar Radin today accused DAP of sponsoring sex blogger duo Alvin Tan and Vivian Lee – better known as Alvivi – in producing a Ramadan greeting image of them having pork dish Bah Kut Teh on social media Facebook.

“Since the photo was released last week, many from the Chinese community have come out to condemn the action.

“Malaysians now demand Alvin and Vivian to be charged and thrown to jail immediately.

“Maybe the trend (of insulting Muslim) was a result of the 13th general election… maybe DAP have sponsored them,” he said when debating the supplementary budget motion in the Parliament today.

His statement prompted DAP parliamentarians Nga Kor Ming (Taiping), Ngeh Koo Ham (Beruas) and Anthony Loke (Seremban) to immediately urge Bung Mokhtar to retract his slanderous remarks.

Teresa Kok (DAP-Seputeh) cited Standing Order 36 that an MP was prohibited to utter statement that amounted to malicious allegation against fellow parliamentarians.

To this Bung Mokhtar replied: “I did not say DAP parliamentarian, I said DAP, the party in general.”

He continued by criticising Tan and Lee’s behaviour, saying that the duo had shifted their focus to Malaysia after previously posting their explicit videos in Singapore.

“I fear that Bandar Kuching (Chong Chieng Jen, also from DAP) might also be involved,” he said, causing another round of havoc in the House.

“Retract the statement, this is clearly a malicious statement against an individual,” Chong shouted.

“No, I was trying to get your clarification because I was worried that you might have watched it (the sex clips of the duo),” Bung Mokhtar said.

The episode ended with the deputy speaker Ismail Mohd Said ordering Bung Mokhtar and Chong to shift to another topic.

He also said there was no need for Bung Mokhtar to retract his remarks because both Bung Mokhtar and Chong have uttered malicious remarks against each other.

Tan and Lee were hauled up by the Malaysia Communication and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) yesterday over their Facebook posting.


- http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/

Sabotage in Kuala Besut may lead to '16-16'?

A mobile text message from a local UMNO leader in Kuala Besut calling on BN supporters to vote for PAS’s candidate Azlan Yusof caught the attention of PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu, who said an internal sabotage was looming within UMNO ahead of the July 24 by-election.

“This is a SMS I received from a local UMNO leader asking people to vote for the PAS candidate. The purpose is to change (prime minister) Najib (Razak)’s mind for failing to appoint a suitable person to head Tabung Haji," Mat Sabu said in a speech during campaigning in Kuala Besut.

Najib’s decision to appoint Baling MP Abdul Azeez as chairman of the Hajj fund, replacing long-serving Abi Musa Asa'ari Mohamed Nor, drew flak from many quarters.

Mat Sabu pointed out that Terengganu voters were now in the 'mood for change', saying this could be seen from the increase in opposition gains from 8 seats in 2008 to 15 in 2013.

“The urban and semi-urban areas have changed, so this by-election we hope the Kuala Besut voters will make change, we must join the urban voters to change,” he added.

PAS adopted the theme ‘16:16 New Terengganu’ as the main thrust of its campaign in the battle for Kuala Besut, in reference to the possibility of a hung state assembly between Pakatan Rakyat and BN, which now has 15 and 16 seats respectively.

Alvin and Vivian told to surrender

Alvin and Vivian told to surrender Malaysia's Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar has asked a pair of controversial sex bloggers to surrender themselves to the Kuala Lumpur police.

Mr Khalid said the police wanted to investigate Alvin Tan and Vivian Lee for causing disharmony, disunity and hatred on grounds of religion, which means they can be arrested, the Malaysian Insider reported.

Last Thursday, Mr Tan and Ms Lee uploaded on their Facebook page a picture depicting them eating bak kut teh, or pork rib soup, and describing it as fragrant, delicious and appetising, with a Selamat Berbuka Puasa (Happy Breaking Fast) greeting.

They could be prosecuted for displaying offensive pictures and words under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act.

- ANN/ST

Full article: http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=129852:alvin-and-vivian-told-to-surrender&Itemid=2#ixzz2ZDKv8Y00
Follow us: @MsiaChronicle on Twitter

PR sues EC-7, seeks to declare GE13 void

Pakatan Rakyat today named seven members of the Election Commission in a lawsuit over the body's biased conduct of the May 5 general election.

The seven are EC's top duo Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof and his deputy Wan Ahmad Wan Omar, and fellow commissioners Mohamad Ramji Ali, P. Manogran, Christopher Wan Soo Kee, Md Yusop Mansor and Abdul Aziz Khalidin.

The suit was filed by lawyer and PKR's Subang R Sivarasa at the Kuala Lumpur High Court, on behalf of five PR candidates who include Dzulkefly Ahmad, M. Manoharan, Saifuddin Nasution, Ariffin Abd Rahman and Abbo Rajoo, all of whom will be represented by well known constitutional lawyer Tommy Thomas.

Among others, they want a declaration that the results of the general election were null and void due to fraud as well as the failure of the indelible ink exercise.

Announcing the suit, PKR's Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar said the suit was being targeted at each of the EC commissioners rather than the EC collectively, adding that each member must be accountable over the series of problems encountered.

PAS's deputy secretary general Takiyuddin Hassan meanwhile pointed out that filing the lawsuit was the proper way of addressing electoral fraud since the police had failed to initiate its investigation on the EC despite thousands of police reports.

DAP Youth chief Anthony Loke questioned the refusal of the authorities to name the supplier of the ink used on voters, adding that now that election was over, the EC had no reason to hide details about the ink. -HD

Friday, July 12, 2013

Perak’s Stolen Election: The Second Time Round

Perak’s Stolen Election: The Second Time RoundMany Malaysians are aware of the first time when the people of Perak had their state election results in which they had chosen the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) coalition to govern the state overturned by trickery and deceit. At that time in 2009, three state legislators elected on PR tickets defected to the Barisan Nasional (BN) in a move which was masterminded by the Prime Minister, Najib Razak, as head of Perak’s BN.

Subsequently, the Sultan of Perak refused Menteri Besar Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin's request to dissolve the state assembly and call for new elections. Instead, Barisan Nasional (BN), with support from the three defecting assemblymen, formed the new – and in the minds of Perakians – illegitimate state government.

Close State Election Results Favoured BN

In the recent 2013 elections, history has repeated itself. This time the election appears to have been stolen with more conventional methods. According to the official tally, BN won 31 seats to the PR’s 28 in a closely contested race. But on close analysis of the results, we find that BN won 8 of the state seats (and 2 parliamentary ones) with wafer thin majorities.

Winning by small margins is not unique to BN candidates. A small number of PR candidates also squeaked through by small margins. But the large number of narrow victories by BN candidates – not only in Perak but throughout the country – in our colonial-inspired electoral system of first past the post winner has raised alarm bells among election watchers.

Cheating in Elections

There is general agreement that cheating at the electoral booth can influence outcomes in close races. Such cheating takes many forms. Some of the major ways include:

1. Tampering of the electoral rolls including registering foreign nationals as registered voters; individuals registered doubly as regular and postal voters; phantom voters;

2. Biased and unreliable counting and tallying practices

3. Questionable postal votes

4. Dirty tactics of election officials aimed at favouring one candidate or party.

Given the well-known bias of the Election Commission towards the BN, its lack of independence and its inability to implement even the most basic of measures to cut down on electoral fraud through the use of indelible ink, it is not surprising that the BN, especially UMNO, has been able to win the majority of closely contested seats.

BM1 Programme Targeted at Voters

Besides these forms of cheating at local level, other more sophisticated forms of influencing the election outcome were practiced on a nation-wide scale. One of these election abuses in 2013 included the paying out of monetary inducements under the BM1 programme. This can be regarded as equivalent to general bribery and should have constituted an offence under section 32(a) of the Election Offences Act 1954.

The way in which the BM programme was disbursed was clearly with the specific purpose of influencing the election outcome as applicants were required specific details of his/her State, his/her parliamentary constituency, and state constituency in which each applicant intended to vote

Once the application was ‘approved’, the applicant was given either a letter or an SMS, setting out the place where the monies were to be collected. A chit was attached to the letter, stating ‘’BR1M 2.0, Penyampaian Parliamen/DUN” followed by the name of the parliamentary or state constituency.

On the right hand side of the chit was the logo of the distributing body. Under that was a description of the BN body, organization or committee that coordinated this payment. This was indicated by the words, ‘Pusat khidmat masyarakat’, accompanied by a row of symbols representing the Barisan Nasional parties, UMNO and the words ‘Barisan Nasional, followed by the name of the constituency area.

Text messages were also sent confirming the approval, indicating where the monies could be collected. Government departments handed out the monies. Other bodies that distributed the BR1M monies included the Jawatan Kemajuan dan Keselamatan Kampung (‘JKKK’) which in Perak was dominated by UMNO members.

The primary target of BR1M was the voters in each constituency, whether that was a state or parliamentary constituency. The message that BN sent out through BR1M was that in return for payments under, the recipients ought to vote for BN candidates. One can see from this procedure how simple minded kampong folk were “persuaded” to cast their votes in favour of UMNO and BN. If this does not constitute election abuse, then we will have to completely redefine the meaning of the word “abuse”.

PAS: Taking Up the Fight against the State Election Results

It is gratifying to note that PAS has decided to mount a legal challenge to the state election results in at least 6 state constituencies. These cases may take some time to be resolved and the judiciary perceived by many as influenced by BN, may result in PAS ending up on the losing side.

It could also be that PAS may end up with judgements that support its case. This possibility may seem quite remote but given the new found courage and independence of the judiciary, one should not discount that happening. In such a situation, and if new elections are called for (not necessarily in the six disputed seats, three alone would be sufficient) I am confident that the voters in these constituencies - with the eyes of the nation on them - will vote overwhelmingly for the PR and against the BN candidate. A swing of just two seats against the BN will then produce a PR state government. The impact will not just be in Perak. I predict that this will mark the beginning of the end of BN rule in the country.

Fraudulent and unethical election practices

Finally, whichever way the judgements go, it is still important and necessary to educate the public – both Perak and Malaysian - on the way in which the BN has engaged in various fraudulent and unethical election practices to maintain itself in power. At the very least, PAS will have the full support of the 613,490 voters (55% of the total electorate voted for PR state candidates in 2013) who know that the elections were stolen from them and who will want justice to be done.

Read more: http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/

Thursday, July 11, 2013

Businessman vs engineer in Kuala Besut

PAS is fielding a popular local businessman in its quest to wrest the Kuala Besut state seat in Terengganu from BN at the July 24 by-election.

Azlan Yusof was announced as the party's candidate by president Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang last night. He faces BN’s Tengku Zaihan Che Ku Abdul, an engineer by profession.

Azlan, known among locals as Che Long, 48, is a contractor from Kampung Baru, and runs a wood store in Kuala Besut, with business dealings in neighbouring Kelantan.

Nomination day for Kuala Besut has been set for tomorrow.

A PAS victory would result in a hung state assembly in Terengganu, a historic first in the country's electoral history.

Vice president Husam Musa will head a high-powered campaign management team comprising of senior leaders.

PAS has won four times in Kuala Besut, in 1959, 1969, 1974 and 1999.

Last May, the late A. Rahman Mokhtar gained 8,809 votes, defeating PAS's Napisah Ismail who got 6,375 votes, a majority of 2,434 votes. -HD

To repeal or not? Cabinet torn apart over Sedition Act

Conflicting statements and claims by ministers over the government's promise last year to repeat the Sedition Act have now threatened to split prime minister Najib Razak’s cabinet.

Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi had defended the draconian act as necessary, a stand contradictory to Najib’s July 2012 pledge to have it replaced by National Harmony Act.

"I think the Sedition Act need not be abolished. Otherwise, what is there left?” Zahid said.

Echoing Zahid is none other than former UMNO strongman Dr Mahathir Mohamad, urging Najib not to bow to Pakatan Rakyat’s demand for the act to be abolished.

Mahathir even supported the claim by Health minister Dr S. Subramaniam, who said Najib had only mentioned the abolition of the Sedition Act as an idea.

Subramaniam went a step further calling Najib to again bring his idea to cabinet meeting for discussion.

But Tourism minister Nazri Aziz, who was minister in the Prime Minister’s Department and the de-facto Law minister, rebuffed Zahid and Subramaniam’s claim.

He said abolition of the Act had already been decided last year by the cabinet.

"It's a public commitment made by the prime minister. I don't see why any minister would go against it," Nazri said, while chiding colleagues Subramaniam and Zahid for not remembering the cabinet decision.

“Maybe it’s (because of) so many cabinet meetings,” he suggested.

Harakahdaily's political analyst Li Fook Gao said it would be interesting to see the stand to be taken by deputy prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin.

“Muhyiddin’s decision on Sedition Act will send a signal to UMNO members whether he is ready to challenge Najib for party presidency at the upcoming assembly,” he said.

-HD

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

UMNO in trouble, says former UMNO chief propagandist

Former group editor of UMNO's New Straits Times A. Kadir Jasin said UMNO members were currently in dilemma over the no-contest call for the party’s top two posts in the upcoming party election.

“To the public and the press, they agree that the top two positions should not be contested, ostensibly to prevent a split.

"...But they are despising, condemning and badmouthing. They protest against the top two posts not being contested,” wrote Kadir in a blog posting.

Under the new rule, Kadir said aspiring candidates must announce which post they are aiming for.

“For that, we understand the person who is worst affected by this dilemma is the number two man (Muhyiddin Yassin, UMNO deputy president),” he added.

Kadir said he was convinced UMNO president Najib Razak would defend his position despite having performed worse than his predecessor Abdullah Badawi, who was forced to resign as UMNO president and prime minister after the 2008 general election.

“Has Muhyiddin, the person who showed the exit door to Abdullah, who had won 140 seats in Parliament, overlooked that Najib had actually performed worse?” chided Kadir.

Kadir said UMNO members should evaluate carefully who saved the party during the last general election.

“Was it the UMNO president or UMNO's rural supporters who feared about the Malays if PR won and DAP emerged the strongest party?” he asked, referring to the oft repeated claim by BN tha PR's victory would be disastrous to Malays.

Kadir also chided non-Muslims 'hypocrisy' in supporting Najib to remain as UMNO president, saying the latter had blamed the Chinese for BN’s performance.

But he added that the non-Malays, especially the Chinese, would not want to see a strong UMNO and government as it would make it harder for them to make demands. -HD

Stop the flip-flop and start repealing draconian acts

PAS has urged prime minister Najib Razak and his administration to to display courage in repealing draconian laws enacted by the British colonial government, in response to latest confusing statements from government leaders.

"Najib must no longer be allowed to do his usual flip-flopping and zig-zagging on critical reforms like repealing this sedition act. Any attempt at stifling the democratisation wave is an act of 'subversion and treason' to this beloved nation," said the Islamic party's head of Research, Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad.

He said there were enough provisions in the Penal Code to handle "obnoxious behaviours", adding that moral sanctions and societal abhorrence were still the best means in combating menaces such as racism and bigotry which could break apart the country's harmony.

"Such 'racial and religious' bigots would be expunged and be made 'irrelevant or 'marginalised' by the citizenry. That is punitive indeed yet doesn't curtail so-called freedom and liberty," he added.

Dzulkefly was responding to BN's Segamat member of parliament and Health minister Dr S Subramaniam, who defended the government's continued use of the Sedition Act on its opponents by saying that Najib had never declared its abolition.

Instead, Subramaniam said it was merely a suggestion.

"He [Najib] has to bring it back to cabinet,” he was quoted by the Malay Mail Online as saying.

Najib had in July 2012 said that the Sedition Act 1948 would be abolished and replaced with a 'National Harmony Act'. The announcement was then seen as an extension of his promised series of reforms which he first announced on the eve of Malaysia Day in 2011.

Dzulkefly meanwhile called on Najib to be firm in responding to Subramaniam's latest statement.

"He needs no apologia from his subordinates or worse still be contradicted by his member of Cabinet. His [Najib's] rhetoric on political transformation is otherwise hollow and breeds contempt," he stressed. -HD